Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-09-09

SHREYAS SINHA vs THE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES

Citation / case number
SC 2020/1636
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHREYAS SINHA
Respondent
THE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the amendment to the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences Act, which mandated a reservation of at least 30% of seats for students domiciled in West Bengal. The court found that the amendment was valid and in accordance with the state's legislative powers. Consequently, the appeal against the Calcutta High Court's dismissal of the appellant's admission request was rejected, affirming the state's right to implement such reservations.

SHREYAS SINHA vs THE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES · Niyam