Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-09-04

Raghav Gupta vs State ( Nct Of Delhi)

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 4188
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raghav Gupta
Respondent
State ( Nct Of Delhi)
Author
Navin Sinha
Bench
Indira Banerjee, Navin Sinha, R.F. Nariman

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the prosecution of Raghav Gupta under Rule 32(e) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, concerning the misbranding of Snapple Juice Drink. The court found that the product was compliant with standards but lacked necessary declarations, leading to the prosecution. The appeal was disposed of based on this undisputed ground, emphasizing the importance of compliance with labeling regulations in food safety.

Raghav Gupta vs State ( Nct Of Delhi) · Niyam