Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-11-06

VETINDIA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2020/5173
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VETINDIA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
Respondent
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the indefinite blacklisting order dated 08.09.2009 against the appellant under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 was in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations of misbranding. The Court emphasized that the delay in filing the writ petition should not bar the appellant from seeking relief, given the ongoing consequences of the blacklisting. The Court held that the blacklisting order was unjustified and allowed the writ petition, thereby quashing the blacklisting order.

VETINDIA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam