Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-11-05

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2020/1688
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction of Nirmal Sen, a nominated officer of Hindustan Unilever Limited, under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The Court emphasized the necessity for the trial court to revisit the evidence and provide a fresh judgment, particularly considering the company's status as an accused. The ruling clarified that if the company is acquitted, the same benefit extends to the nominated officer, thereby reinforcing the principle of fair trial and due process under Section 401(1) of the Cr.P.C.

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam