Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-19

MUNISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2016/7161
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUNISH KUMAR
Respondent
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Author
THE CHIEF , HEMANT GUPTA, AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant seeking compassionate appointment after the death of his father, a government employee. The court found that the rejection of the application based on age limits was inappropriate since the retirement application was approved posthumously and had no valid basis. The court held that the case fell under the relevant policy clause for employees who die in service, thereby allowing the appellant's claim for compassionate appointment.

MUNISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH · Niyam