Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-27
CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED vs SRI RABINDRANATH CHOUBEY
- Citation / case number
- SC 2013/30261
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED
- Respondent
- SRI RABINDRANATH CHOUBEY
- Author
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
- Bench
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court held that the withholding of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, cannot be justified by pending disciplinary proceedings after the employee's superannuation. Citing the precedent in Jaswant Singh Gill vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (2007) 1 SCC 663, the Court emphasized that the right to gratuity is statutory and cannot be impaired by internal rules of the employer. The Court upheld the High Court's decision directing the appellant to release the gratuity amount to the respondent, establishing that disciplinary actions cannot affect gratuity post-retirement.