Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-11

Foundation For Media Professionals vs Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2020 SC 963
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Foundation For Media Professionals
Respondent
Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir
Author
N.V. Ramana
Bench
B.R. Gavai, R. Subhash Reddy, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that restrictions on internet services must be proportionate and subject to timely review, as established in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) SCC Online SC 25. The Court emphasized that the right to health, education, and freedom of speech are impacted by internet access, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court found that the Respondent's blanket restriction of mobile internet speed to 2G without a Review Committee violates the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017, and directed the need for rational justification for such restrictions.

Foundation For Media Professionals vs Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir · Niyam