Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-27

Chairman Cum Managing Director ... vs Sri Rabindranath Choubey

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 2978
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chairman Cum Managing Director ...
Respondent
Sri Rabindranath Choubey
Author
M.R. Shah
Bench
Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah, Ajay Rastogi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 34.3 of the Conduct, Discipline & Appeal Rules, 1978, an employer can withhold gratuity during the pendency of disciplinary proceedings initiated while the employee was in service. The Court clarified that such proceedings can continue post-superannuation, and the employer is entitled to recover any pecuniary loss caused by the employee's misconduct as per Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the employer's decision to withhold gratuity, affirming the legality of the disciplinary process.

Chairman Cum Managing Director ... vs Sri Rabindranath Choubey · Niyam