Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-01

Commr.Of Central Excise vs M/S Uni Products India Ltd. Through Its ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 2332
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commr.Of Central Excise
Respondent
M/S Uni Products India Ltd. Through Its ...
Author
Aniruddha Bose
Bench
Aniruddha Bose, Deepak Gupta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court adjudicated on the classification of 'car matting' under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, determining whether it falls under Chapter 57 for 'Carpets and Other Textile Floor Coverings' or Chapter 87 for 'Vehicles and Parts'. The Court held that the classification should be under Chapter 57, specifically under sub-heading 5703.90, affirming the lower tribunal's decision and rejecting the revenue's claim for classification under Chapter 87, which would impose a higher excise duty. The Court emphasized the importance of correct classification for determining applicable excise duties under Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Commr.Of Central Excise vs M/S Uni Products India Ltd. Through Its ... · Niyam