Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-05-13

Jagmail Singh vs Karamjit Singh

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 2319
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jagmail Singh
Respondent
Karamjit Singh
Author
Krishna Murari
Bench
Krishna Murari, Navin Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the application under Section 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, stating that the appellants failed to prove the existence of the original Will necessary for allowing secondary evidence. The Court emphasized that without serving notice to the revenue official as required under Section 66, the application for secondary evidence was not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' rulings.

Jagmail Singh vs Karamjit Singh · Niyam