Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-03-02

THE PERIYAR DISTRICT CONSUMER CO OPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. NO. AA467 vs B. BALAGOPAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2018/21003
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE PERIYAR DISTRICT CONSUMER CO OPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. NO. AA467
Respondent
B. BALAGOPAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal against the decree for damages awarded by the Trial Court under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Court confirmed that the plaintiffs were entitled to compensation for the defendant's unauthorized occupation of the premises, amounting to Rs.26,98,367/-, along with future loss costs of Rs.3,56,000/-. The ruling emphasized the enforceability of tenancy agreements and the right of landlords to seek damages for wrongful retention of property.

THE PERIYAR DISTRICT CONSUMER CO OPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. NO. AA467 vs B. BALAGOPAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS · Niyam