Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-03-04

MADHYA PRADESH HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT BOARD vs VIJAY BODANA

Citation / case number
SC 2017/31214
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADHYA PRADESH HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Respondent
VIJAY BODANA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the approval of a modified layout plan under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, emphasizing that such modifications must align with the original layout to prevent unplanned development. The Court reiterated the principle of promissory estoppel, stating that developers cannot alter land use to mislead allottees who paid premium prices for plots based on promised amenities. The ruling affirmed that the land must be used according to the original layout plan, thereby protecting the interests of the allottees.

MADHYA PRADESH HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT BOARD vs VIJAY BODANA · Niyam