Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-03-17

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . vs ANIL PADEGAONKAR

Citation / case number
SC 2008/26936
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. .
Respondent
ANIL PADEGAONKAR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals from Bharat Petroleum Corporation and Anil Padegaonkar regarding a disciplinary action. The court found that the initial charge-sheet was invalid as it was not issued by the appropriate disciplinary authority. While reinstating the employee, the court denied back wages due to the issuance of a fresh charge-sheet and the employee's superannuation. The decision emphasizes the importance of proper procedural adherence in disciplinary actions.

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . vs ANIL PADEGAONKAR · Niyam