Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-03-04

Madhya Pradesh Housing And ... vs Vijay Bodana

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 2163
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Madhya Pradesh Housing And ...
Respondent
Vijay Bodana
Author
Sanjiv Khanna
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sharad A. Bobde

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the approval of a modified layout plan by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board, citing Section 31 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. The Court established that the principle of promissory estoppel applies, preventing the appellant from altering the land use in a manner that deceives allottees who paid for plots based on the original layout. The Court held that the land must be developed according to the original plan, ensuring that the interests of the allottees and the local municipal authority are protected.

Madhya Pradesh Housing And ... vs Vijay Bodana · Niyam