Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-06-19

S. KASI vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL NADU

Citation / case number
SC 2020/11405
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. KASI
Respondent
STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL NADU
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provide for default bail, are meant to protect personal liberty and cannot be overridden by the Supreme Court's order dated 23.03.2020 regarding the extension of time for filing charge sheets. The Court found that the Madras High Court erred in interpreting the Supreme Court's order as extending the time limit under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's dismissal of the bail application was set aside, granting the appellant default bail.

S. KASI vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL NADU · Niyam