Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-07-24

R. PALANISAMY vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 2019/46811
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. PALANISAMY
Respondent
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a special leave petition concerning the promotion of Office Assistants and Record Clerks to the post of Junior Bailiff in Tamil Nadu. The petitioners contended that their promotion should not require the SSLC qualification based on a prior High Court ruling and the timing of the vacancies. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal, affirming that the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 supersedes previous judgments, and the qualifications must be adhered to as per the current law.

R. PALANISAMY vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS · Niyam