Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-07-14

ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL

Citation / case number
SC 2017/39058
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR
Respondent
KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, in the context of election petitions challenging the election of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar. The court referred to previous judgments, particularly Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer and Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, to clarify the admissibility of electronic evidence. The court ultimately allowed the appeals and set a precedent for future cases involving electronic records in election disputes.

ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL · Niyam