Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-07-22

MOHAMMED YOUSUF @ MOULA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Citation / case number
SC 2010/10043
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MOHAMMED YOUSUF @ MOULA
Respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Sections 366, 343, 323, and 506 IPC, affirming the trial court's decision. The Court noted that the victim was a minor at the time of the incident, and her consent was not a valid defense against the charges of kidnapping and abduction. The Court emphasized that Section 366 IPC criminalizes the act of abducting a woman with the intent to compel her marriage against her will, thereby reinforcing the legal principle that consent is irrelevant in cases involving minors.

MOHAMMED YOUSUF @ MOULA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA · Niyam