Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-07-31

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL vs MANJIT KAUR

Citation / case number
SC 2008/4680
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL
Respondent
MANJIT KAUR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, the admissibility of secondary evidence is contingent upon the party seeking to introduce it demonstrating that the original document is unavailable. The Court emphasized that mere assertion of loss is insufficient; the party must provide adequate proof of the circumstances surrounding the loss. The judgment clarified the standards for proving the unavailability of original documents, thereby upholding the principles of evidence law.

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL vs MANJIT KAUR · Niyam