Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-01-29

SHRIPAL BHATI vs STATE OF UP

Citation / case number
SC 2017/7583
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHRIPAL BHATI
Respondent
STATE OF UP
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the Writ Petition challenging the appointment of respondent no. 4 as Project Engineer (Electrical) in NOIDA, stating that the recruitment and absorption were permissible under the NOIDA Service Regulations, 1981, as per Sections 3, 5, and 19 of the U.P. Industrial Development Act, 1976. The Court clarified that the appellants' eligibility for promotion was not affected by the absorption of respondent no. 4, and thus their challenge was not maintainable. The judgment confirmed the authority's discretion in appointments under the relevant regulations.

SHRIPAL BHATI vs STATE OF UP · Niyam