Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-01-07

M.E. SHIVALINGAMURTHY vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BENGALURU

Citation / case number
SC 2017/70
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.E. SHIVALINGAMURTHY
Respondent
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BENGALURU
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), specifically Sections 120B, 420, and 409, in relation to conspiracy and cheating. The Court established that the mere existence of a conspiracy does not automatically imply the commission of an offense under Section 420 IPC unless there is clear evidence of deceit and wrongful gain. The judgment upheld the conviction of the accused under the relevant sections, reinforcing the need for substantial proof in cases of conspiracy and fraud.

M.E. SHIVALINGAMURTHY vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BENGALURU · Niyam