Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-01-08

Indian Bank vs Promila .

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2020 SC 20
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Indian Bank
Respondent
Promila .
Author
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Bench
K.M. Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment is not an inherent right and must adhere to the scheme in place at the time of the employee's death, as established in Canara Bank & Anr. v. M. Mahesh Kumar. The Court clarified that the provisions of the compassionate appointment scheme applicable on 15.1.2004, the date of Jagdish Raj's death, must be considered, and that benefits like family pension do not substitute for employment assistance. The Court emphasized that the relevant scheme must be strictly followed, rejecting any claims based on subsequent schemes.

Indian Bank vs Promila . · Niyam