Supreme Court of India · 2020-01-08
Indian Bank vs Promila .
- Citation / case number
- AIRONLINE 2020 SC 20
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- Indian Bank
- Respondent
- Promila .
- Author
- Sanjay Kishan Kaul
- Bench
- K.M. Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment is not an inherent right and must adhere to the scheme in place at the time of the employee's death, as established in Canara Bank & Anr. v. M. Mahesh Kumar. The Court clarified that the provisions of the compassionate appointment scheme applicable on 15.1.2004, the date of Jagdish Raj's death, must be considered, and that benefits like family pension do not substitute for employment assistance. The Court emphasized that the relevant scheme must be strictly followed, rejecting any claims based on subsequent schemes.