M/S Fair Communciation And Consultant. vs Surender Kardile

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh High Court correctly decreed the suit for recovery of ₹ 80,000/- under the principles of contract law, emphasizing that the defendant, Sanjay, did not adequately prove his defense of repayment. The Court noted that the execution of the General Power of Attorney and the subsequent loan agreement were established, and the trial court's dismissal was overturned. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, thereby allowing the appeal for recovery of the amount lent by the plaintiff, Surendra.