Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-19

MR. RAJENDRA K. BHUTTA vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2018/47825
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MR. RAJENDRA K. BHUTTA
Respondent
MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, clarifying that the moratorium imposed under this section does not extend to licenses for entering land under Joint Development Agreements. The Court held that such licenses are personal and do not constitute property interests, thus allowing the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority to terminate the Joint Development Agreement and reclaim possession of the land. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's decision.

MR. RAJENDRA K. BHUTTA vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. · Niyam