Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-28

CANARA BANK vs P SELLATHAL (DEAD) THR LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2018/42178
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CANARA BANK
Respondent
P SELLATHAL (DEAD) THR LRS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 2586 of the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence in establishing the elements of the offense. The Court held that mere suspicion is insufficient for conviction and that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment reaffirmed the principles of criminal jurisprudence regarding the burden of proof and the rights of the accused, ultimately leading to the acquittal of the accused due to lack of evidence.

CANARA BANK vs P SELLATHAL (DEAD) THR LRS · Niyam