Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-18

ASSISTANT ENGINEER (D1) AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED vs RAHAMATULLAH KHAN ALIAS RAHAMJULLA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/33890
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ASSISTANT ENGINEER (D1) AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Respondent
RAHAMATULLAH KHAN ALIAS RAHAMJULLA
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, clarifying that the term 'first due' refers to the point at which a demand for payment is made and acknowledged by the consumer. The Court held that a licensee cannot disconnect electricity supply for amounts billed under a wrong tariff after two years, as such demands are barred by limitation. The judgment upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's ruling that the additional demand was time-barred, thus affirming consumer protection against unjust billing practices.

ASSISTANT ENGINEER (D1) AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED vs RAHAMATULLAH KHAN ALIAS RAHAMJULLA · Niyam