Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-10

PRATHVI RAJ CHAUHAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/31176
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRATHVI RAJ CHAUHAN
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Section 18A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, which nullifies the directions given in Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra, (2018) 6 SCC 454, regarding anticipatory bail and preliminary inquiries. The Court held that the provisions of Section 18A are arbitrary and violate Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing the necessity of safeguards against misuse of the Act. Consequently, the Court struck down Section 18A, reaffirming the right to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.PC.

PRATHVI RAJ CHAUHAN vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam