Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-11

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,GOA vs M/S ADANI EXPORTS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER

Citation / case number
SC 2004/10589
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,GOA
Respondent
M/S ADANI EXPORTS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 130A(1) and (4) of the Customs Act, the High Court has discretion to direct the Appellate Tribunal to refer questions of law, and is not mandatorily required to call for a statement from the Tribunal in every case. The Court overruled the previous judgment in Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore v. Central Manufacturing Tech. Institute, which incorrectly stated that the High Court must always call for a statement. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,GOA vs M/S ADANI EXPORTS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER · Niyam