Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-28

Shri Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel vs The State Of Gujarat

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2020 SC 274
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shri Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel
Respondent
The State Of Gujarat
Author
Hemant Gupta
Bench
Hemant Gupta, D.Y. Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the proceedings arising from FIR No. 3 of 2007, which involved allegations under Sections 420, 406, 419, 467, 468, 379, 465, 475, 120-B, and 114 of the IPC, should not be quashed but rather transferred to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Surat, where a related complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 is pending. The Court emphasized the importance of resolving both cases together to avoid contradictory judgments, given that they revolve around the same cheque. The appeal was disposed of with this direction, ensuring both matters are heard concurrently.

Shri Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel vs The State Of Gujarat · Niyam