Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-02-18

State Of Maharshtra vs Pan India Paryatan Limited

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 1237
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharshtra
Respondent
Pan India Paryatan Limited
Author
Hemant Gupta
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Hemant Gupta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the interpretation of Sections 3(1)(b), 3(2), and subsections 5(a) and (b) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, regarding the rates of entertainment duty applicable to amusement parks. The Court confirmed that the duty for the first three years is nil, followed by 3.75% for the fourth and fifth years, and 7.5% thereafter. The Court ruled in favor of the writ petitioners, allowing their challenge against the higher duty demand and affirming the lower rates as valid.

State Of Maharshtra vs Pan India Paryatan Limited · Niyam