Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-08-19

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT vs M/S. CERA BOARD AND DOORS, KANNUR, KERALA

Citation / case number
SC 2009/24960
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT
Respondent
M/S. CERA BOARD AND DOORS, KANNUR, KERALA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the undervaluation of goods by M/s. CERA Boards and Doors, leading to evasion of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 4,29,01,384. The Court upheld the findings of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the imposition of differential duty under Section 11A(1), interest under Section 11AB, and penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q. The judgment affirmed the legality of the show cause notices issued and the penalties imposed, thereby reinforcing the enforcement of excise duty regulations.

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT vs M/S. CERA BOARD AND DOORS, KANNUR, KERALA · Niyam