Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-04-17

Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh vs Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2020 SC 616
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh
Respondent
Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh
Author
R. Subhash Reddy
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R. Subhash Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to quash the advertisement dated 16.08.2016 for the post of Director at the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) was incorrect. The Court emphasized that the age limit for eligibility should consider the revised age of superannuation set at 65 years, as per the Office Memorandum dated 20.04.2016. The Court directed that the advertisement must include appropriate relaxations for the upper age limit, thereby allowing the petitioners to participate in the selection process.

Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh vs Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh · Niyam