Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2020

Supreme Court of India · 2020-04-22

Hira Singh vs Uoi

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3255
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hira Singh
Respondent
Uoi
Author
M.R. Shah
Bench
M.R. Shah, Indira Banerjee, Arun Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court referred several questions regarding the interpretation of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) to a three-judge bench, specifically questioning the validity of the precedent set in E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau (2008) 5 SCC 161. The court highlighted that the previous ruling may have overlooked critical provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly regarding the determination of punishment based on the total quantity of a mixture containing narcotic substances rather than just the content of the narcotic drug. The court's holding indicates a need for reconsideration of how mixed substances are treated under the NDPS Act, particularly in relation to Section 21.

Hira Singh vs Uoi · Niyam