Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-05

M/S MAYAVTI TRADING PVT. LTD. vs PRADYUAT BED MURMAN

Citation / case number
SC 2019/11317
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S MAYAVTI TRADING PVT. LTD.
Respondent
PRADYUAT BED MURMAN
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of 12.03.2019, affirming that under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court's role is limited to examining the existence of an arbitration agreement. The court clarified that the appointment of an arbitrator is a judicial power, and disputes must be settled without unnecessary delay. The court found no prima facie dispute existed as the respondent had signed a discharge voucher, indicating accord and satisfaction, thus leaving no arbitral dispute to adjudicate.

M/S MAYAVTI TRADING PVT. LTD. vs PRADYUAT BED MURMAN · Niyam