Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-25

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) vs MRS. PRAMILA VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL

Citation / case number
SC 2017/23350
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)
Respondent
MRS. PRAMILA VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the Bombay High Court's order dated 14.12.2015, which allowed the discharge of accused No. 2 under Section 13(1)(e) and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, while dismissing the CBI's revision application against the discharge of accused No. 1. The Court held that the High Court's decision was justified based on the evidence presented, affirming the discharge of accused No. 2 and maintaining the dismissal of the CBI's appeal. The judgment underscores the importance of evidentiary standards in corruption cases under the P.C. Act.

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) vs MRS. PRAMILA VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL · Niyam