Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-16

PUDA vs VIDYA CHETAL

Citation / case number
SC 2015/365
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PUDA
Respondent
VIDYA CHETAL
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the jurisdiction of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) regarding the legality of fees imposed by the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority. The court expressed doubt on the correctness of the previous judgment in HUDA vs. Sunita, which held that such fees do not constitute 'deficiency in service' under the Consumer Protection Act. The court emphasized the need for a re-evaluation of the earlier decision, considering the beneficent nature of the Consumer Protection legislation.

PUDA vs VIDYA CHETAL · Niyam