Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-26

NARAYNAMMA AND ANR ETC ETC vs GOVINDAPPA AND ORS. ETC ETC

Citation / case number
SC 2015/33360
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NARAYNAMMA AND ANR ETC ETC
Respondent
GOVINDAPPA AND ORS. ETC ETC
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Karnataka High Court which dismissed the appeals concerning the specific performance of a sale agreement related to property originally owned by Bale Venkataramanappa. The court found that the plaintiff, Govindappa, had a valid claim based on the agreement to sell, and the legal representatives of the deceased defendants were properly represented. The judgment reinforces the principles surrounding specific performance in property disputes.

NARAYNAMMA AND ANR ETC ETC vs GOVINDAPPA AND ORS. ETC ETC · Niyam