Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-24

NEVADA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR LTD. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2010/40026
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NEVADA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR LTD.
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'any property' under Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ruling that it includes both movable and immovable property. The Court overruled the majority judgment of the Bombay High Court which held that 'any property' did not encompass immovable property, thereby affirming the minority view that police officers have the authority to seize immovable property under certain circumstances. The Court's holding clarifies the scope of police powers in property seizure during criminal investigations.

NEVADA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR LTD. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam