Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-26

State Of Mp vs Arati Saxena

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 2314
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Mp
Respondent
Arati Saxena
Author
A.S. Bopanna
Bench
Hrishikesh Roy, A.S. Bopanna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court affirming the Labour Court's award under Sections 31, 61, and 62 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, which categorized the respondent as a permanent employee after she had worked for over six months continuously in a vacant post. The Court found that the Labour Court correctly interpreted the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1963, particularly Standing Order 2(vi), allowing for the respondent's classification as permanent despite her initial temporary status. The appeal by the State of Madhya Pradesh was dismissed, affirming the Labour Court's findings and the High Court's order.

State Of Mp vs Arati Saxena · Niyam