Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-09-12

Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs Nittin Johari

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 4380
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Serious Fraud Investigation Office
Respondent
Nittin Johari
Author
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Bench
Ajay Rastogi, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's decision to grant bail to Nittin Johari in a serious fraud case involving the siphoning of funds from Bhushan Steel Ltd. The court emphasized the gravity of the allegations under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the potential for tampering with evidence. Ultimately, the court set aside the bail order, highlighting the need for stringent measures in cases of serious financial fraud.

Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs Nittin Johari · Niyam