Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-10-25

SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ DEHAR POWER HOUSE CIRCLE BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (PW) SLAPPER vs EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, SUNDERNAGAR/ASSESSING AUTHORITY

Citation / case number
SC 2019/17259
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ DEHAR POWER HOUSE CIRCLE BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (PW) SLAPPER
Respondent
EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, SUNDERNAGAR/ASSESSING AUTHORITY
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the High Court could condone the delay in filing a revision under Section 48 of the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, beyond the stipulated 90 days. The court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, do not apply in this context, thereby reinforcing the strict timeline for filing revisions. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ DEHAR POWER HOUSE CIRCLE BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (PW) SLAPPER vs EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, SUNDERNAGAR/ASSESSING AUTHORITY · Niyam