Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-10-04

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH vs RAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/19259
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Respondent
RAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS.
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Gauhati High Court erred in ruling that road traffic offences must only be prosecuted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and that prosecution under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is without legal sanction. The Court emphasized that Section 5 IPC recognizes the supremacy of special laws like the M.V. Act, which provides a specific procedure for road traffic offences. Consequently, the Court ruled that the prosecution of road traffic offences under the IPC is impermissible unless the M.V. Act does not adequately address the offence, thereby affirming the need to adhere to the provisions of the M.V. Act for such cases.

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH vs RAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS. · Niyam