Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-10-22

Municipal Corpn.Of Greater Mumbai vs Harish Lamba Of Bombay, Indian ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 5543
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Municipal Corpn.Of Greater Mumbai
Respondent
Harish Lamba Of Bombay, Indian ...
Author
A.M. Khanwilkar
Bench
A.M. Khanwilkar, Indira Banerjee, Dinesh Maheshwari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, does not permit the imposition of water benefit tax on a property where the water supply has been discontinued. The Court found that the appellant's demand for payment of water benefit tax from the respondent, despite the absence of water supply since 1993, was illegal. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the demand and the Warrant of Attachment issued by the appellant.

Municipal Corpn.Of Greater Mumbai vs Harish Lamba Of Bombay, Indian ... · Niyam