Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-10-15

H. S. Yadav vs Shakuntala Devi Parakh

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 5098
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H. S. Yadav
Respondent
Shakuntala Devi Parakh
Author
Deepak Gupta
Bench
Surya Kant, Deepak Gupta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which allows for a direct appeal to the Supreme Court from the Rent Control Tribunal. The Court held that such a provision is inconsistent with the hierarchy of appeals established under the Constitution, particularly Articles 136, 226, and 227, which govern the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and High Courts. Consequently, the Court ruled that the provision for direct appeal to the Supreme Court is invalid and unconstitutional, thereby upholding the established appellate framework.

H. S. Yadav vs Shakuntala Devi Parakh · Niyam