Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-10-04

The State Of Arunachal Pradesh vs Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas.

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 4954
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Arunachal Pradesh
Respondent
Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas.
Author
Indu Malhotra
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, Indu Malhotra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Gauhati High Court erred in ruling that road traffic offences must solely be prosecuted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and that prosecution under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is without legal sanction. The Court clarified that while the M.V. Act provides specific provisions for traffic offences, it does not preclude prosecution under the IPC where applicable, particularly in cases where the M.V. Act does not provide adequate punishment. The Court emphasized that the IPC can still be invoked in instances of causing hurt or damage, thus maintaining the applicability of both statutes in relevant contexts.

The State Of Arunachal Pradesh vs Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas. · Niyam