Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-11-26

PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC vs HSCC (INDIA) LIMITED

Citation / case number
SC 2019/27558
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC
Respondent
HSCC (INDIA) LIMITED
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating under Section 11(6) and Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, held that the appointment of a sole arbitrator is warranted as per the arbitration clause in the contract dated 22nd May 2017 between the parties. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the dispute resolution mechanism outlined in the contract, affirming that disputes arising from the contract should be resolved through arbitration. Consequently, the Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC vs HSCC (INDIA) LIMITED · Niyam