Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-11-13

SHRIMANTH BALASAHEB PATIL vs HONBLE SPEAKER KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

Citation / case number
SC 2019/27353
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHRIMANTH BALASAHEB PATIL
Respondent
HONBLE SPEAKER KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of disqualification orders issued by the Speaker of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution. It emphasized that the Speaker must act impartially and uphold constitutional values while distinguishing between dissent and defection. The Court held that the disqualification proceedings initiated after the resignation of the members were valid, reinforcing the Speaker's authority to maintain stability in governance until the term's expiry, thus upholding the constitutional mandate.

SHRIMANTH BALASAHEB PATIL vs HONBLE SPEAKER KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY · Niyam