Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-11-15

COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs SATISH KUMAR GUPTA

Citation / case number
SC 2019/24417
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
Respondent
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutional validity of Sections 4 and 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019, and clarified the roles of resolution applicants, resolution professionals, and the Committee of Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court held that the NCLT and NCLAT have jurisdiction over approved resolution plans and emphasized the importance of adhering to the eligibility criteria under Section 29-A of the Code. The appeals were admitted, allowing for further examination of the resolution plans submitted for Essar Steel India Limited.

COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs SATISH KUMAR GUPTA · Niyam