Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-11-27

VURIMI PULLARAO S/O SATYANARAYANA vs VEMARI VYANKATA RADHARANI W/O DHANKOTESHWARRAO

Citation / case number
SC 2017/9209
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VURIMI PULLARAO S/O SATYANARAYANA
Respondent
VEMARI VYANKATA RADHARANI W/O DHANKOTESHWARRAO
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's decision that the suit for specific performance was barred under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court noted that the appellant had previously filed a suit for injunction without seeking leave to file a subsequent suit for specific performance, thus affirming the concurrent findings of the lower courts. The judgment reinforces the procedural requirements under the CPC regarding the filing of multiple suits arising from the same cause of action.

VURIMI PULLARAO S/O SATYANARAYANA vs VEMARI VYANKATA RADHARANI W/O DHANKOTESHWARRAO · Niyam