Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-11-27

Hindustan Construction Company ... vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 122
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hindustan Construction Company ...
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
V. Ramasubramanian, Surya Kant, R.F. Nariman

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended by the 2019 Amendment Act, and the repeal of Section 26 of the 2015 Amendment Act. The Court held that the automatic stay provision under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, creates undue hardship for petitioners like Hindustan Construction Company Limited, who face delays in recovering dues from government bodies. The Court emphasized the need for a balanced approach to ensure that legitimate claims are not unduly stalled, thereby impacting the operational viability of contractors.

Hindustan Construction Company ... vs Union Of India · Niyam